From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 02 Aug 2000 21:07:21 EDT
My Dear G,
I regret I must leave for a few days, but do expect to be back in time for Tay's defense of her Overlordship. However, life is chancy and I must travel far.
I will respond to your remarkable post when I return. Your twists and turns of thought in search of logical responses must be admired for it's tenacity if not accuracy.
You may call me Andrew we are well enough acquainted for that.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
Plea to the Baron's Council
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 02 Aug 2000 21:09:52 EDT
My dear Sidartha,
You lack the intellectual capacity and ease of expression to really assemble a interesting insult. Please do continue though, I find it entertaining and perhaps you may one day actually deliver one without stepping on your tongue.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
Date: 02 Aug 2000 21:09:52 EDT
My dear Sidartha,
You lack the intellectual capacity and ease of expression to really assemble a interesting insult. Please do continue though, I find it entertaining and perhaps you may one day actually deliver one without stepping on your tongue.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: ianmackenzie@aol.com (Ian MacKenzie)
Date: 03 Aug 2000 06:52:30 EDT
"You lack the intellectual capacity and ease of expression to really assemble a interesting insult."
Physician, heal thyself.
Regards,
Ian Rex.
Date: 03 Aug 2000 06:52:30 EDT
"You lack the intellectual capacity and ease of expression to really assemble a interesting insult."
Physician, heal thyself.
Regards,
Ian Rex.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 03 Aug 2000 22:39:11 EDT
My Dear Ian,
It is always amusing when someone trys to answer for another. You are amusing.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
Date: 03 Aug 2000 22:39:11 EDT
My Dear Ian,
It is always amusing when someone trys to answer for another. You are amusing.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 03 Aug 2000 22:40:32 EDT
My Dear G,
My reason for leaving the community for a few days no longer exists, so I will speak with you tomorrow on your interesting post.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
Date: 03 Aug 2000 22:40:32 EDT
My Dear G,
My reason for leaving the community for a few days no longer exists, so I will speak with you tomorrow on your interesting post.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 05 Aug 2000 18:51:54 EDT
My Dear G,
I now have time to devote myself to answering your interesting post on the cork
<<Whether or not you consider me an honorable man is none of my concern, that is your concern. I know where I stand, and where I stand is where I choose.>>
To this I reply that a honorable man is known by his actions and again in my opinion your actions in this entire Ariadne and Taylara issue have not been the actions of a honorable person.
<<Is that not in itself, a form of honor? Actually, I do not want you to answer that. So do not.>>
Alas, that which is written can not be exempted from discussion so I would remind you that honor is based in significant portions of those who perceive you. I do not think of you as a dishonorable person, but one who has allowed jealousy and resentment govern their actions.
<<Who would I replace them with? Funny you should mention that, as wheels are in motion to ensure honorable title holders. Respectable title holders. Clear thinking title holders. Above all else, title holders who do not have the capability to give me an intense migraine headache due to frustrations of attempting over and over to explain things that are incredibly obvious to even the most clueles.>>
Still, you did not answer the question. Who are these stalwart people you seem to think will be more to your liking? I ask this because I honestly have no idea of who seems to meet the rigid standards you have set.
So please inform the world at large who you see as the White Knights. Your intolerance, anger and cloudy judgement surely would not place you in that elite company you speak of one would think, but please do enlighten us.
<<Idiots and childminds do not deserve to hold titles.>>
In this regard you are being judgemental for no reason as we all know the only criteria for holding titles is Wins over Losses.
<<In closing, you ask who do I fight for. Let me just say... You can ask.>>
Very well. I ask.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
Date: 05 Aug 2000 18:51:54 EDT
My Dear G,
I now have time to devote myself to answering your interesting post on the cork
<<Whether or not you consider me an honorable man is none of my concern, that is your concern. I know where I stand, and where I stand is where I choose.>>
To this I reply that a honorable man is known by his actions and again in my opinion your actions in this entire Ariadne and Taylara issue have not been the actions of a honorable person.
<<Is that not in itself, a form of honor? Actually, I do not want you to answer that. So do not.>>
Alas, that which is written can not be exempted from discussion so I would remind you that honor is based in significant portions of those who perceive you. I do not think of you as a dishonorable person, but one who has allowed jealousy and resentment govern their actions.
<<Who would I replace them with? Funny you should mention that, as wheels are in motion to ensure honorable title holders. Respectable title holders. Clear thinking title holders. Above all else, title holders who do not have the capability to give me an intense migraine headache due to frustrations of attempting over and over to explain things that are incredibly obvious to even the most clueles.>>
Still, you did not answer the question. Who are these stalwart people you seem to think will be more to your liking? I ask this because I honestly have no idea of who seems to meet the rigid standards you have set.
So please inform the world at large who you see as the White Knights. Your intolerance, anger and cloudy judgement surely would not place you in that elite company you speak of one would think, but please do enlighten us.
<<Idiots and childminds do not deserve to hold titles.>>
In this regard you are being judgemental for no reason as we all know the only criteria for holding titles is Wins over Losses.
<<In closing, you ask who do I fight for. Let me just say... You can ask.>>
Very well. I ask.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: drakewyni@aol.com (Drakewyn I)
Date: 07 Aug 2000 12:25:36 EDT
One comment.
"<<Idiots and childminds do not deserve to hold titles.>>
In this regard you are being judgemental for no reason as we all know the only criteria for holding titles is Wins over Losses."
Then mayhaps you do not understand this community, nor G's statement, at all Mister Pyre.
He did not say they could not hold titles... for it is clearly obvious his opinions of certain people. He did say that they do not deserve to hold titles... which speaks not of the written criterion, but of the unwritten ones which many among the community hold in thier hearts.
Again, I hold my personal views of the Barons, Baroness' and Overlord to myself, for they are my own.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
Date: 07 Aug 2000 12:25:36 EDT
One comment.
"<<Idiots and childminds do not deserve to hold titles.>>
In this regard you are being judgemental for no reason as we all know the only criteria for holding titles is Wins over Losses."
Then mayhaps you do not understand this community, nor G's statement, at all Mister Pyre.
He did not say they could not hold titles... for it is clearly obvious his opinions of certain people. He did say that they do not deserve to hold titles... which speaks not of the written criterion, but of the unwritten ones which many among the community hold in thier hearts.
Again, I hold my personal views of the Barons, Baroness' and Overlord to myself, for they are my own.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: sidarthax@aol.com (Sidartha x)
Date: 07 Aug 2000 21:02:27 EDT
Mr. Pyre~
Ian MacKenzie has every right to speak for me, for reasons you'll never understand. How very hypocritical for you to deem me intellectually incapable and yet you do not have the mental capacity to form a coherant thought.
Aye, do please heal thyself.
~Sidartha Elgarette
Date: 07 Aug 2000 21:02:27 EDT
Mr. Pyre~
Ian MacKenzie has every right to speak for me, for reasons you'll never understand. How very hypocritical for you to deem me intellectually incapable and yet you do not have the mental capacity to form a coherant thought.
Aye, do please heal thyself.
~Sidartha Elgarette
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 08 Aug 2000 21:26:15 EDT
My Dear Lady Drake,
I knew exactly what I was saying and said it as I intended. Mr G was being judgemental in his statements which is what I took him to task for. What is it with so many of the residents of this fair community that they feel they must answer for someone else?
So far Mr. G has defended himself and his actions in his usual belicose fashion and probably does not need your able assistance. I could be wrong of course.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
Date: 08 Aug 2000 21:26:15 EDT
My Dear Lady Drake,
I knew exactly what I was saying and said it as I intended. Mr G was being judgemental in his statements which is what I took him to task for. What is it with so many of the residents of this fair community that they feel they must answer for someone else?
So far Mr. G has defended himself and his actions in his usual belicose fashion and probably does not need your able assistance. I could be wrong of course.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: andrewpyre@aol.com (AndrewPyre)
Date: 09 Aug 2000 20:50:48 EDT
My Dear Sidartha,
You speak nonesense and in doing so reveal your painful incapability to communicate.
Only babes in arms, and children need have someone speak for them. If you are neither of these then speak for yourself.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
<<Ian MacKenzie has every right to speak for me, for reasons you'll never understand. How very hypocritical for you to deem me intellectually incapable and yet you do not have the mental capacity to form a coherant thought.>>
Date: 09 Aug 2000 20:50:48 EDT
My Dear Sidartha,
You speak nonesense and in doing so reveal your painful incapability to communicate.
Only babes in arms, and children need have someone speak for them. If you are neither of these then speak for yourself.
Your humble servant,
Andrew Pyre
<<Ian MacKenzie has every right to speak for me, for reasons you'll never understand. How very hypocritical for you to deem me intellectually incapable and yet you do not have the mental capacity to form a coherant thought.>>
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: sartanz@aol.com (Sartan Z)
Date: 09 Aug 2000 21:06:30 EDT
>You speak nonesense and in doing so reveal your painful incapability to
>communicate.
::snickers like mad, heading back to the Tavern to find Py and point this out to her::
Date: 09 Aug 2000 21:06:30 EDT
>You speak nonesense and in doing so reveal your painful incapability to
>communicate.
::snickers like mad, heading back to the Tavern to find Py and point this out to her::