Official Protest

Read-only archive for the Duel of Swords
Locked
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:17 pm

From: morganalefay@aol.com (Morgana le Fay)
Date: 28 Sep 1999 11:10:59 EDT

"Until you can furnish proof of your accusations, I can only assume they are spurious and baseless."

"If you cannot furnish proof, then the argument is spurious and baseless."

The proof is already furnished for you, Drakewyn. It is not that I "cannot" furnish proof for it is already there. You simply must stop making things up to suit your fancy. What is more accurate to say is that I will not do your research for you. The proof is here. Read the posts.
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:17 pm

From: jonalyn@aol.com (Jonalyn)
Date: 28 Sep 1999 20:17:45 EDT

Madame Silvertree

Thee thineself hae presented prima facie evidence 'o thine duplicity. Thee hae claimed mos' conveniently th' thee dinna anna longer hae t' evidence 'o thine mishandling 'o th' warlord Goldie's challenge unta th' then Baron Magnus yet thee admit by thine own hand th' th' original bona fides presented unta thee were invalid.

Thee validated th' challenge 'o Elijah when in fact t'was improperly presented. Thee hae removed warlords from t' official lists in direct contradiction 'o th' rules 'o engagement. Thee 'eld thine silence in th' matter 'o th' challenge involvin' th' Lady Topaz agin th' Baroness Ashleana, knowin' full well th' th' baroness hae nae complied wi' t' rules 'o engagement.

Madame, t' proof be writ by thine own 'and, Madame. Further anna claim by thee th' thou hast performed thine duties properly an' in a fair an unbiased manner be in fact baseless an' spurious. Thee hae so oft made attempt t' cast thineself ast the martyr, Madame, when in point 'o fact tis th' duels wh' hae suffered for thine deeds.

Tis amusin' thee wouldst attempt agin th' Lady 'o Avalon th' same tactic thee didst attempt agin th' Lady Topaz. Certes th' Lady Morgan's 'usband hae nae annathin' t' do wi' t' matter. How utterly drool 'o thee ta attempt t' avoid answerin' fer yuir mishandlin' an' tamperin' wi' challenges an' thine attempts t' tamper wi' t' Baron's Council.

Bluntly,
Jonalyn Starfare
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:18 pm

From: drakewyni@aol.com (Drakewyn I)
Date: 29 Sep 1999 04:08:43 EDT

::Ignoring Lady Starfare's post, as she said she would, she responds to Morgan's post.::

Morgan.

You have once again twisted my words beyond the written meaning. I am not making up anything here, nor am I -accusing- you of making up anything. I merely wish to see what you base your arguements on so I may refute them publicly... though I am certain I have either refuted, or explained to the point of honest acceptance by the community, every situation there is.
I have read all those posts, I'm asking you to prove your case before the community or cease your attacks upon my character.


Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:18 pm

From: thshighwaymen9@aol.com (THS Highwaymen 9)
Date: 05 Oct 1999 19:06:56 EDT

Whippah! This Jona-who really wants to pin this Jayc for whatever, yip yip? Why don't she challenge, no? Make for affective removal of this "stain" to our sport, yup yup?

Fuezzah!
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:18 pm

From: dreystarke@aol.com (DreyStarke)
Date: 05 Oct 1999 20:30:50 EDT

This Jona-who really wants to pin this Jayc for whatever, yip yip? Why don't she challenge, no? Make for affective removal of this "stain" to our sport, yup yup?




Probly because Jaycy is not a baron and Jona is not a warlord.

I never knew a rat/squirrel/thingy could write.



- Drey D'erest Sanchez Starke
Locked