From: zafiroo@aol.com (Zafiroo)
Date: 14 Mar 2000 10:18:10 EST
>Further, I do request thine reasons for stepping in to make a decision which
>rightly wouldst fall unto the Council of Barons
Jona,
My appologies I had miss read as too whom this was directed.
Zafiroo Turidan
Baron of the First
Zafiroo Turidan
Baron of the First
Kept in the Dark
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: zafiroo@aol.com (Zafiroo)
Date: 14 Mar 2000 10:39:07 EST
>E'en more to the point, if' thee hae perused the cork, thee shall find
>another faulty ruling made by Madame Silvertree in the matter of the
>challenge unto the new Baron Damien Mortis by the warlord Xeric Mues.
That has nothing to do with this post, but since you brought it up. I did read this message and saw there error. If you would have read further you would have seen she had also found her mistake and had apologized for it.
>I shall nae make the assumption, sir, that thou art one of those who wishes
>silence to surround a decision involving nae only the rights of the Overlord
>but perchance as well the rights of the seated Barons and which apparently
>hae the hand of Madame Silvertree involved.
You are correct I do not agree that those decisions should be done in silence.
The keyword at the end of your statement is apparently.
While I may not agree with all of her decisions I do respect them. If there is an error in one of her or any other officials decision then it should be brought to light and handled respectively so that it can be corrected. They should not be attacked and blamed for blatantly forcing a wrong decision unless proven otherwise in further statements.
The acceptance of Xeric Mues challenge to Damien Mortis was wrong, but she did admit to her mistake and corrected it. I can see no fault in that.
Respectfully,
Zafiroo Turidan
Baron of the First
Zafiroo Turidan
Baron of the First
Date: 14 Mar 2000 10:39:07 EST
>E'en more to the point, if' thee hae perused the cork, thee shall find
>another faulty ruling made by Madame Silvertree in the matter of the
>challenge unto the new Baron Damien Mortis by the warlord Xeric Mues.
That has nothing to do with this post, but since you brought it up. I did read this message and saw there error. If you would have read further you would have seen she had also found her mistake and had apologized for it.
>I shall nae make the assumption, sir, that thou art one of those who wishes
>silence to surround a decision involving nae only the rights of the Overlord
>but perchance as well the rights of the seated Barons and which apparently
>hae the hand of Madame Silvertree involved.
You are correct I do not agree that those decisions should be done in silence.
The keyword at the end of your statement is apparently.
While I may not agree with all of her decisions I do respect them. If there is an error in one of her or any other officials decision then it should be brought to light and handled respectively so that it can be corrected. They should not be attacked and blamed for blatantly forcing a wrong decision unless proven otherwise in further statements.
The acceptance of Xeric Mues challenge to Damien Mortis was wrong, but she did admit to her mistake and corrected it. I can see no fault in that.
Respectfully,
Zafiroo Turidan
Baron of the First
Zafiroo Turidan
Baron of the First