Again, the deceit of Madame Silvertree finds the light of da
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: jonalyn@aol.com (Jonalyn)
Date: 20 Jun 2000 23:07:14 EDT
Madame Silvertree,
How verra like thee to backpedal and attempt to support further patently false statements with a claim of , "My recollection of the event". Tis thee hae long proven precisely what thine words be worth, Madame, ast well ast just how addled a brain thou must hae. Thine word nae be worth the breath thee expend. It truly befuddles the mind that duties which require the utmost honor and trust yet remain in thine hands, when thee canna e'en report
happenings and conversations with e'en a modicum of preciseness.
Ast for thee, Percy, perhaps thee might actually read yuir own jottings and take yuir own advice. Rest assured, Percy, thee make believe thine comments to be paternalistic, superior and condescending. Frankly, I find them utterly hypocritical, which shouldst certes nae surprise annaone.
Jonalyn Starfare
Date: 20 Jun 2000 23:07:14 EDT
Madame Silvertree,
How verra like thee to backpedal and attempt to support further patently false statements with a claim of , "My recollection of the event". Tis thee hae long proven precisely what thine words be worth, Madame, ast well ast just how addled a brain thou must hae. Thine word nae be worth the breath thee expend. It truly befuddles the mind that duties which require the utmost honor and trust yet remain in thine hands, when thee canna e'en report
happenings and conversations with e'en a modicum of preciseness.
Ast for thee, Percy, perhaps thee might actually read yuir own jottings and take yuir own advice. Rest assured, Percy, thee make believe thine comments to be paternalistic, superior and condescending. Frankly, I find them utterly hypocritical, which shouldst certes nae surprise annaone.
Jonalyn Starfare
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: drakewyni@aol.com (Drakewyn I)
Date: 21 Jun 2000 06:06:30 EDT
Interesting.
I am not surprised that you believe the terms of the duel favored me, Morgan.
It is public knowledge that the Ward has little to no effect upon my person. I use my own magicks to heal myself when I duel.
It is public knowledge that I normally use a blade which has very great magickal powers and enhances my own physical strength and speed when I wield it.
It is public knowledge that Jonalyn has more experience than I in dueling... both in years and in duels watched. I cannot say for certain if she has actually dueled more duels than I, but given the records in the older copies of the Standings I tend to believe she has not.
Now tell me again, Morgan, how these terms benefit myself over her.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
Date: 21 Jun 2000 06:06:30 EDT
Interesting.
I am not surprised that you believe the terms of the duel favored me, Morgan.
It is public knowledge that the Ward has little to no effect upon my person. I use my own magicks to heal myself when I duel.
It is public knowledge that I normally use a blade which has very great magickal powers and enhances my own physical strength and speed when I wield it.
It is public knowledge that Jonalyn has more experience than I in dueling... both in years and in duels watched. I cannot say for certain if she has actually dueled more duels than I, but given the records in the older copies of the Standings I tend to believe she has not.
Now tell me again, Morgan, how these terms benefit myself over her.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: drakewyni@aol.com (Drakewyn I)
Date: 21 Jun 2000 06:20:56 EDT
Starfare.
If what I recall you said is incorrect... please edjucate the populous on your exact words.
As for my duties... surprisingly enough, all duels are kept track of in writing. I am not the historian, so it is not my duty to keep track of the conversations... only the duels themselves.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
Date: 21 Jun 2000 06:20:56 EDT
Starfare.
If what I recall you said is incorrect... please edjucate the populous on your exact words.
As for my duties... surprisingly enough, all duels are kept track of in writing. I am not the historian, so it is not my duty to keep track of the conversations... only the duels themselves.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: morganalefay@aol.com (Morgana le Fay)
Date: 21 Jun 2000 11:01:05 EDT
" Now tell me again, Morgan, how these terms benefit myself over her."
Imagine making the same terms to Karnafexx. That he cannot use his signature weapon (sap gloves), but instead, must use steel blade as you demanded in your challenge to Jonalyn. What if you challenged me with these terms and my weapon was an enchanted wooden staff? Would, I, too, have to give up my preferred weapon in order to meet you on your terms? Would you also ask that I hold back my earned skill? If I were too tall, shall I fight upon my
knees so you will think it more fair? Perhaps tying one hand behind my back might soothe your concerns about a "fair" duel.
If you want to duel someone, then duel them as they like to duel. To ask for anything less is cowardly, dishonorable, and reprehensible. Do not try to force them into your concept of what a duel should be fought with. If a person refuses to duel under your terms, do not muddle the situation by saying they must be afraid to duel you or whatever else you concluded. The plain fact of the matter is that they do not wish to go by your suspicious,
restrictive terms of combat.
If people use magic in their duel, it is not your place to restrict them. What you should do is adjust your own strategy to compensate.
Or is this still not clear enough for you?
Good day.
Date: 21 Jun 2000 11:01:05 EDT
" Now tell me again, Morgan, how these terms benefit myself over her."
Imagine making the same terms to Karnafexx. That he cannot use his signature weapon (sap gloves), but instead, must use steel blade as you demanded in your challenge to Jonalyn. What if you challenged me with these terms and my weapon was an enchanted wooden staff? Would, I, too, have to give up my preferred weapon in order to meet you on your terms? Would you also ask that I hold back my earned skill? If I were too tall, shall I fight upon my
knees so you will think it more fair? Perhaps tying one hand behind my back might soothe your concerns about a "fair" duel.
If you want to duel someone, then duel them as they like to duel. To ask for anything less is cowardly, dishonorable, and reprehensible. Do not try to force them into your concept of what a duel should be fought with. If a person refuses to duel under your terms, do not muddle the situation by saying they must be afraid to duel you or whatever else you concluded. The plain fact of the matter is that they do not wish to go by your suspicious,
restrictive terms of combat.
If people use magic in their duel, it is not your place to restrict them. What you should do is adjust your own strategy to compensate.
Or is this still not clear enough for you?
Good day.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: unsignedtext@aol.com (Unsigned Text)
Date: 21 Jun 2000 20:02:54 EDT
Funny, according to the dictionary, refusing means that one does not agree to something. If I'm reading correctly, Madame Starfare did not agree to duel Miss Silvertree. The particulars are irrelavent. By the very definition of the word, Jonalyn refused to duel Drakewyn.
So gee, that whole huge argument about putting exact words up on the board was pretty much uselsess, wasn't it?
Date: 21 Jun 2000 20:02:54 EDT
Funny, according to the dictionary, refusing means that one does not agree to something. If I'm reading correctly, Madame Starfare did not agree to duel Miss Silvertree. The particulars are irrelavent. By the very definition of the word, Jonalyn refused to duel Drakewyn.
So gee, that whole huge argument about putting exact words up on the board was pretty much uselsess, wasn't it?
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: jonalyn@aol.com (Jonalyn)
Date: 21 Jun 2000 20:55:59 EDT
To the one so bold ast to hae the ability to comment, and the lack of intestinal fortitude to sign such comment,
Odd that thee take ast factual the statement of Madame Drakewyn. Then again, perhaps nae so odd, for those with nae the wit to discern the quite obvious desperation of Madame Silvertree.
Madame Silvertree,
Drakey Poo, I hae nae need atall to, ast thou hast penned, "edjucate" (sic) the populus. Tis enough I know thou art, in thine desperation, resorting to penning outright falsehoods, Madame. Thou hast in past resorted to such heinous behavior. It merely shows further the desperate lengths to which thee shall go to appear ast a personage of import.
Thee must pardon me, for I do find your back pedaling almost piteous. First thee stated, and I quote thee precisely, "Steel and skill alone, no magic but the Ward.", then thee pen there shall be nae use of personal magics, then thee pen that thine own personal magics are used to heal thineself. Dost recall mine answer unto thee that eve, Madame Silvertree?
I am further amused, Madame, by certain other statements thee didst bleat upon the night in question, to whit: "Many in the community were quick to call for action when the Supervisor declared an extension. When the extension elapsed...I believe the words of those who decried the Supervisor's extension weighed too heavily upon the Council." The comment assuredly directed to me, Madame and so very indicative of thine nature and desperation. How
very amusing, Madame, to seemingly grant that perhaps mine statements wouldst hae effect upon the Council. Dost perchance that rub against a nerve, Madame?
Drakey Poo, do wallow in the mire of bleating and lies thou art creating about thineself, it suits thee. Thee shall certes find support among those what hae nae experience of thee and perhaps e'en among those that do hold such behavior ast something to laud. How shall thee pay the price, Madame Silvertree, when the lies thou dost weave unravel and reveal thee for the debased personage thou art?
Jonalyn Starfare
Date: 21 Jun 2000 20:55:59 EDT
To the one so bold ast to hae the ability to comment, and the lack of intestinal fortitude to sign such comment,
Odd that thee take ast factual the statement of Madame Drakewyn. Then again, perhaps nae so odd, for those with nae the wit to discern the quite obvious desperation of Madame Silvertree.
Madame Silvertree,
Drakey Poo, I hae nae need atall to, ast thou hast penned, "edjucate" (sic) the populus. Tis enough I know thou art, in thine desperation, resorting to penning outright falsehoods, Madame. Thou hast in past resorted to such heinous behavior. It merely shows further the desperate lengths to which thee shall go to appear ast a personage of import.
Thee must pardon me, for I do find your back pedaling almost piteous. First thee stated, and I quote thee precisely, "Steel and skill alone, no magic but the Ward.", then thee pen there shall be nae use of personal magics, then thee pen that thine own personal magics are used to heal thineself. Dost recall mine answer unto thee that eve, Madame Silvertree?
I am further amused, Madame, by certain other statements thee didst bleat upon the night in question, to whit: "Many in the community were quick to call for action when the Supervisor declared an extension. When the extension elapsed...I believe the words of those who decried the Supervisor's extension weighed too heavily upon the Council." The comment assuredly directed to me, Madame and so very indicative of thine nature and desperation. How
very amusing, Madame, to seemingly grant that perhaps mine statements wouldst hae effect upon the Council. Dost perchance that rub against a nerve, Madame?
Drakey Poo, do wallow in the mire of bleating and lies thou art creating about thineself, it suits thee. Thee shall certes find support among those what hae nae experience of thee and perhaps e'en among those that do hold such behavior ast something to laud. How shall thee pay the price, Madame Silvertree, when the lies thou dost weave unravel and reveal thee for the debased personage thou art?
Jonalyn Starfare
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: drakewyni@aol.com (Drakewyn I)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 02:18:59 EDT
Starfare
You say I have broken my word, I say prove I have done so.
When I stated no magic, I meant it. I hardly believe I would need to heal myself before the duel was over.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
Date: 22 Jun 2000 02:18:59 EDT
Starfare
You say I have broken my word, I say prove I have done so.
When I stated no magic, I meant it. I hardly believe I would need to heal myself before the duel was over.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: morganalefay@aol.com (Morgana le Fay)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 10:18:25 EDT
"The particulars are irrelavent. By the very definition of the word, Jonalyn refused to duel Drakewyn. "
The particulars are relevant as the particulars are the terms of the duel. Had there been no terms, then you would be correct that the particulars are irrelevant.
If I understand correctly, and I will admit I am applying a prediction of how I would react, Jonalyn refused to duel Drakewyn based on those restrictive terms.
I wonder had Drakewyn simply challenged Jonalyn to a duel with no other terms other than the Ward would prevent against serious injury or death, would Jonalyn have accepted the duel? We will not know as Drakewyn was too greedy and asked for too much.
Perhaps next time, she will not try to manipulate a duel to her advantage so she has a better chance at making whatever point she is trying to make. Or maybe she will continue making unreasonable terms and add that Jonalyn must wear a too-tight beanie, or lead-filled shoes and dance a tiring jig after each round, as well as fight only with steel weaponry and ban usage of personal magics.
Date: 22 Jun 2000 10:18:25 EDT
"The particulars are irrelavent. By the very definition of the word, Jonalyn refused to duel Drakewyn. "
The particulars are relevant as the particulars are the terms of the duel. Had there been no terms, then you would be correct that the particulars are irrelevant.
If I understand correctly, and I will admit I am applying a prediction of how I would react, Jonalyn refused to duel Drakewyn based on those restrictive terms.
I wonder had Drakewyn simply challenged Jonalyn to a duel with no other terms other than the Ward would prevent against serious injury or death, would Jonalyn have accepted the duel? We will not know as Drakewyn was too greedy and asked for too much.
Perhaps next time, she will not try to manipulate a duel to her advantage so she has a better chance at making whatever point she is trying to make. Or maybe she will continue making unreasonable terms and add that Jonalyn must wear a too-tight beanie, or lead-filled shoes and dance a tiring jig after each round, as well as fight only with steel weaponry and ban usage of personal magics.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: unsignedtext@aol.com (Unsigned Text)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 12:04:28 EDT
Madame Jonalyn, perhaps you should address the argument rather than the one making it. The point is valid no matter who states it.
Lady Morgan, I'm simply pointing out the fact that Jonalyn based one of her attacks upon Lady Silvertree by stating that she did not refuse to fight. I quote... "How verra like thee, bein' th' liar that thou art, ta claim Ah refused." This statement is not only rude, but it incites that she did not refuse the duel and attacks Drakewyn for stating that she
did.
Unless Jonalyn accepted the duel, no matter the conditions, she did refuse the duel. You said so yourself, even though you added an addendum to the end of the sentence.
Drakewyn was utterly correct in saying as much. If you want to argue particulars, at least begin by basing your arguments on the right fact; that she refused for certain reasons. But admit the fact that there was a refusal in the first place.
I'd like to point out the fact Drakewyn was called a liar for stating truth in this case. I'd like to see a retraction of that particular attack as well.
Date: 22 Jun 2000 12:04:28 EDT
Madame Jonalyn, perhaps you should address the argument rather than the one making it. The point is valid no matter who states it.
Lady Morgan, I'm simply pointing out the fact that Jonalyn based one of her attacks upon Lady Silvertree by stating that she did not refuse to fight. I quote... "How verra like thee, bein' th' liar that thou art, ta claim Ah refused." This statement is not only rude, but it incites that she did not refuse the duel and attacks Drakewyn for stating that she
did.
Unless Jonalyn accepted the duel, no matter the conditions, she did refuse the duel. You said so yourself, even though you added an addendum to the end of the sentence.
Drakewyn was utterly correct in saying as much. If you want to argue particulars, at least begin by basing your arguments on the right fact; that she refused for certain reasons. But admit the fact that there was a refusal in the first place.
I'd like to point out the fact Drakewyn was called a liar for stating truth in this case. I'd like to see a retraction of that particular attack as well.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: hostdfcturi@aol.com (HOST DFC Turi)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 14:43:57 EDT
Ta all concerned, particularly Jonalyn and Drakewyn,
How about we all stop with the childish games of "She did it!" and find somethin more entertainin ta do? This whole mess is a waste of space and parchment, and I'm heartily sick of it. Either keep yer private arguments private or DO somethin about them, but fer the love of light and darkness, stop wastin everyone else's time with them.
Turi
::walks away from the board muttering::
Date: 22 Jun 2000 14:43:57 EDT
Ta all concerned, particularly Jonalyn and Drakewyn,
How about we all stop with the childish games of "She did it!" and find somethin more entertainin ta do? This whole mess is a waste of space and parchment, and I'm heartily sick of it. Either keep yer private arguments private or DO somethin about them, but fer the love of light and darkness, stop wastin everyone else's time with them.
Turi
::walks away from the board muttering::
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: leducblanc@aol.com (LeDucBlanc)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 15:11:54 EDT
>Either keep yer private arguments private or DO somethin about them, but fer
>the love of light and darkness, stop wastin everyone else's time with them.
>
Hear here! Well said, Turi. It is good to see someone representing the staff making a firm stance regarding much of the worthless waste that takes up so much of these boards.
Hopefully this is a precedent.
Duc Percival Marchand de Clermont
Warlord of the Duel of Swords
The White Duke
Date: 22 Jun 2000 15:11:54 EDT
>Either keep yer private arguments private or DO somethin about them, but fer
>the love of light and darkness, stop wastin everyone else's time with them.
>
Hear here! Well said, Turi. It is good to see someone representing the staff making a firm stance regarding much of the worthless waste that takes up so much of these boards.
Hopefully this is a precedent.
Duc Percival Marchand de Clermont
Warlord of the Duel of Swords
The White Duke
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: novagreys@aol.com (Nova GreyS)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 15:14:48 EDT
I already tried suggesting that, Turi. As you can see, they're killing more trees over their disagreement about when, where, and how they'll duel, if they ever will (can we get some odds on that happening?). How about picking an official and letting them pick the place and method? Loser shuts up. Winner shuts up. This way the rest of us don't have to trip over the reams of paper the two of them and their various
detractors are leaving around. I like that idea.
-NGS
Add one more tree to the list of deceased.
Date: 22 Jun 2000 15:14:48 EDT
I already tried suggesting that, Turi. As you can see, they're killing more trees over their disagreement about when, where, and how they'll duel, if they ever will (can we get some odds on that happening?). How about picking an official and letting them pick the place and method? Loser shuts up. Winner shuts up. This way the rest of us don't have to trip over the reams of paper the two of them and their various
detractors are leaving around. I like that idea.
-NGS
Add one more tree to the list of deceased.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: jonalyn@aol.com (Jonalyn)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 19:45:00 EDT
Madame Silvertree,
Thou shalt pardon mine laughter, but I do recall yuir saying upon more than one occasion that thee hae vowed thee wouldst nae indulge in anna discourse with me. That be merely one example among the numerous times thou hast broken thine word.
To the one who again is unwilling to sign,
Quite simply, thou art predicating yuir argument upon a false premise, that being that what Madame Silvertree hast penned wast factual.
Turi,
Lass, unless thou art by chance being coerced, unbeknownst, to peruse the ancient cork, thou shalt forgive me if I suggest unto thee, that if'n thee find this discourse cause for thine distress, thee certes hae the option 'o nae reading it.
Percy Poo,
Thou shalt certes nae mind that I find much of the drivel thee pen upon the cork only proves thee to be a self centered, self serving sycophant. I do wonder if that particular crouched position causes thine 'old bones' to ache.
Nova,
Thine cynicism ist to be commended, thou hast nae lost that part of thine nature. By the bye, how fares thine hand?
Jonalyn Starfare
Date: 22 Jun 2000 19:45:00 EDT
Madame Silvertree,
Thou shalt pardon mine laughter, but I do recall yuir saying upon more than one occasion that thee hae vowed thee wouldst nae indulge in anna discourse with me. That be merely one example among the numerous times thou hast broken thine word.
To the one who again is unwilling to sign,
Quite simply, thou art predicating yuir argument upon a false premise, that being that what Madame Silvertree hast penned wast factual.
Turi,
Lass, unless thou art by chance being coerced, unbeknownst, to peruse the ancient cork, thou shalt forgive me if I suggest unto thee, that if'n thee find this discourse cause for thine distress, thee certes hae the option 'o nae reading it.
Percy Poo,
Thou shalt certes nae mind that I find much of the drivel thee pen upon the cork only proves thee to be a self centered, self serving sycophant. I do wonder if that particular crouched position causes thine 'old bones' to ache.
Nova,
Thine cynicism ist to be commended, thou hast nae lost that part of thine nature. By the bye, how fares thine hand?
Jonalyn Starfare
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: drakewyni@aol.com (Drakewyn I)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 22:07:37 EDT
Starfare.
Provide your proof, not your hearsay, or have done with it.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
Date: 22 Jun 2000 22:07:37 EDT
Starfare.
Provide your proof, not your hearsay, or have done with it.
Lady Drake, aka the Gryphon.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: zenithi@aol.com (Zenith I)
Date: 22 Jun 2000 23:06:56 EDT
Maybe it's just me, but is anyone else a little disturbed when Jonalyn refers to people using fecal terms?
Date: 22 Jun 2000 23:06:56 EDT
Maybe it's just me, but is anyone else a little disturbed when Jonalyn refers to people using fecal terms?
