A copy of an official document

[DoS Archive]

From: leducblanc@aol.com (LeDucBlanc)
Date: 20 Sep 2000 15:33:43 EDT

Why are we still arguing about this? Turi has made a ruling and it stands. By making a ruling she had done exactly what was needed in this situation, clarify a rather large gray area that came upon us. She didn't bend or break the rules because the rules were, in this situation, too unlcear to be bent or broken. Her decision was a matter of interperetation, and no more or less wrong than any decision in this situation
would have been.
I wanted to see the rules in this situation put to a test. They have been. I wanted to see a ruling from the supervisory staff on this matter. I have. I am happy. I turly think that everyone else should attempt to at least be content. After all, I am sure someone will rule the way you want to in the next few years. This is the first time a precedent has really stood since I have been here. I am sure it won't become a trend.







Duc Percival Marchand de Clermont

Warlord of the Duel of Swords

The White Duke

[DoS Archive]

From: karenwilder@aol.com (Karen Wilder)
Date: 20 Sep 2000 16:48:42 EDT

Everyone.

Ain't it funny how the Overlord said he'd banish any Barons to Renegade that said they was gonna be Loyal?
He din't say nothing about banishing the Barons that hadn't declared yet, just that he'd make 'em Renegade once the week was up.
Seems ta me that he knew the rules purdy good, he just wanted the Standings Keeper gal ta automatically let any of the Barons who declared Loyal know that they was getting banished.
Seems ta me that he wasn't banishing anyone but those what declared Loyal.

I'd still like ta hear it from him though.

Karen Wilder
Knight Templar
Servant of God
Baron of the Fourth Ring

[DoS Archive]

From: ianmackenzie@aol.com (Ian MacKenzie)
Date: 20 Sep 2000 17:21:13 EDT

"Seems ta me that he wasn't banishing anyone but those what declared Loyal."

Well, it's rather hard to banish a Renegade to Renegade, now isn't it?

Regards,
Ian Rex.