Challenge of...
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
Challenge of...
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 19 Feb 1998 21:46:35 EST
::He sits at the ornate desk his wife gave him for Christmas, feeling a lot more comfortable with more space, as opposed to the little room Noelle's desk was giving him::
To Lord Adonai,
This missive is to inform that I, Var Medici-Giovanni, challenge you for your 7th ring. My reasons are simple, and, they will also be posted. Despite the fact that this reason may cause arguments, I have many people whom I think deserve to know who I challenge and why. It is for this reason I post this letter.
Simply stating, I did not, and will not, agree with your actions as you sought to bring barons to support Huma. The condemning of them was even more disappointing. I like Huma, although his previous actions were a tad disappointing as well. However, I do not wish to go off topic.
Your desire was to have the loyal barons support Huma, when he is renegade. Personally, I do not think this is a bright move, since they are on opposite views. The fact you accuse them of turning your back on Huma is not only an insult to them, but an insult to Dal. You expect loyalties to swift to a renegade's side, because he's on the hot spot.
As a result, you pronouncing you switching to renegade, and acted inappropriately through insults/condemning, I challenge you for your ring.
Below are my peer wins. I included an extra in case they do not clear up with Golden.
PW # Name ((OOC SN)) Date Score Caller # rounds
1 Tarl Cabot TarlCab0t 1-29-98 5-2 RDI Summer 8
2 Gnim Gnimoi GnimishRW 1-29-98 5.5-2 RDI Summer 8
3 Cetran Damien Sir Cetran 2-5-98 5.5-2 RDI Mathia 7
4 Topaz Gnimoi TinyTopaz 2-6-98 5-3 RDI Golden 9
5 Daegarth Mith. Daegarth 2-6-98 5-4 RDI Golden 10
6 Caliyah Caliyah 2-7-98 5.5-2 RDI Bird 9
7 Perrinis Alabas. Perrinis 2-12-98 5-4 RDI Rogue 12
8 Falablah Dalegate Falablah 2-12-98 5-4 RDI Rogue 14
9 Nameless one DueIist 2-13-98 5-3 RDI Tyran 6
10 Lyon T'Gar Lyon xx 2-14-98 5.5-4.5 RDI Daemon 14
11 Spike Spikushell 2-15-98 5-2 RDI Clo 9
Date: 19 Feb 1998 21:46:35 EST
::He sits at the ornate desk his wife gave him for Christmas, feeling a lot more comfortable with more space, as opposed to the little room Noelle's desk was giving him::
To Lord Adonai,
This missive is to inform that I, Var Medici-Giovanni, challenge you for your 7th ring. My reasons are simple, and, they will also be posted. Despite the fact that this reason may cause arguments, I have many people whom I think deserve to know who I challenge and why. It is for this reason I post this letter.
Simply stating, I did not, and will not, agree with your actions as you sought to bring barons to support Huma. The condemning of them was even more disappointing. I like Huma, although his previous actions were a tad disappointing as well. However, I do not wish to go off topic.
Your desire was to have the loyal barons support Huma, when he is renegade. Personally, I do not think this is a bright move, since they are on opposite views. The fact you accuse them of turning your back on Huma is not only an insult to them, but an insult to Dal. You expect loyalties to swift to a renegade's side, because he's on the hot spot.
As a result, you pronouncing you switching to renegade, and acted inappropriately through insults/condemning, I challenge you for your ring.
Below are my peer wins. I included an extra in case they do not clear up with Golden.
PW # Name ((OOC SN)) Date Score Caller # rounds
1 Tarl Cabot TarlCab0t 1-29-98 5-2 RDI Summer 8
2 Gnim Gnimoi GnimishRW 1-29-98 5.5-2 RDI Summer 8
3 Cetran Damien Sir Cetran 2-5-98 5.5-2 RDI Mathia 7
4 Topaz Gnimoi TinyTopaz 2-6-98 5-3 RDI Golden 9
5 Daegarth Mith. Daegarth 2-6-98 5-4 RDI Golden 10
6 Caliyah Caliyah 2-7-98 5.5-2 RDI Bird 9
7 Perrinis Alabas. Perrinis 2-12-98 5-4 RDI Rogue 12
8 Falablah Dalegate Falablah 2-12-98 5-4 RDI Rogue 14
9 Nameless one DueIist 2-13-98 5-3 RDI Tyran 6
10 Lyon T'Gar Lyon xx 2-14-98 5.5-4.5 RDI Daemon 14
11 Spike Spikushell 2-15-98 5-2 RDI Clo 9
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: dukeuziei@aol.com (Duke UzieI)
Date: 19 Feb 1998 22:22:12 EST
Patrons of the Duel of Swords,
I have read the challenge of the Warlord and understand his meanings. But I have at no time switched my loyalties to the Crown, nor to I intend to do so.
The Warlord is in error in his perception of a heated debate in which I had in the Arena late one night as I was upset with the public castigation of the Renegade Huma. I did not ask, nor expect the Loyals to openly support Huma in anyway. But I did ask and state rather vehemehently that he, being a Baron, Renegade or no, should not be the object of such public degrading from his peers in title. A Baron is a Baron, no matter his political
affiliations. And such disrespect towards a peer, in my eyes downgrades the titles as a whole. And THAT was the cut and thrust of my argument. Which the Warlord has mispercieved.
I am in communication with the Warlord to see if his intentions are still true after an explanation has been offered. And if he still wishes to go forward I would hope that he could produce another set of reasons. As the ones he has stated here are if not untrue, definately mispercieved.
And if he must press issue after I have made my explanation of my actions and the true meaning of the debate of that night. Then prepare...because I will be extremely swift in the ending of this challenge.
I am,
~Adonai Uziel~
~DragonLord of RhyDin~
~Baron of the Seventh~
Date: 19 Feb 1998 22:22:12 EST
Patrons of the Duel of Swords,
I have read the challenge of the Warlord and understand his meanings. But I have at no time switched my loyalties to the Crown, nor to I intend to do so.
The Warlord is in error in his perception of a heated debate in which I had in the Arena late one night as I was upset with the public castigation of the Renegade Huma. I did not ask, nor expect the Loyals to openly support Huma in anyway. But I did ask and state rather vehemehently that he, being a Baron, Renegade or no, should not be the object of such public degrading from his peers in title. A Baron is a Baron, no matter his political
affiliations. And such disrespect towards a peer, in my eyes downgrades the titles as a whole. And THAT was the cut and thrust of my argument. Which the Warlord has mispercieved.
I am in communication with the Warlord to see if his intentions are still true after an explanation has been offered. And if he still wishes to go forward I would hope that he could produce another set of reasons. As the ones he has stated here are if not untrue, definately mispercieved.
And if he must press issue after I have made my explanation of my actions and the true meaning of the debate of that night. Then prepare...because I will be extremely swift in the ending of this challenge.
I am,
~Adonai Uziel~
~DragonLord of RhyDin~
~Baron of the Seventh~
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: humadragbn@aol.com (HumaDragbn)
Date: 19 Feb 1998 22:56:34 EST
::throws a note up on the board::
Just what did I do? Besides take insult to being challenged for not liking another person on an individual basis.
Huma
current occupant of ring number four
workong on defense number four
Official soft drink of the DoS
waterboy for the TDL allstars
husband, soon to be father extrodenaire
all around good guy with a sword he got from a box of cracker jacks
((are you still reading? go home))
Date: 19 Feb 1998 22:56:34 EST
::throws a note up on the board::
Just what did I do? Besides take insult to being challenged for not liking another person on an individual basis.
Huma
current occupant of ring number four
workong on defense number four
Official soft drink of the DoS
waterboy for the TDL allstars
husband, soon to be father extrodenaire
all around good guy with a sword he got from a box of cracker jacks
((are you still reading? go home))
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 19 Feb 1998 23:14:26 EST
::Adds::
Ladies and gentlemen,
Lord Adonai has accepted my challenge, and has scheduled it at 9:00 (EST) this Saturday, on the Battlefield. Lord Nycholas De Gyrlington (RDI Reiver) has agreed to call.
Since he has accepted my challenge, I state that the one who will stand as my second will be my dear son, Noble Morgan. However, he will not take my place, along with everyone else, should something happen in the course of the duel ((i.e. punt)). My Lady of Honor shall be the lady I always honor and cherish; My Lady Noelle.
My colors shall be blue, with metallic silver swords clashing at the back of my cloak; Lady Noelle's family colors.
My weapon shall be my father's rapier, Savior. May he duel well, and may man's honor win.
±
Date: 19 Feb 1998 23:14:26 EST
::Adds::
Ladies and gentlemen,
Lord Adonai has accepted my challenge, and has scheduled it at 9:00 (EST) this Saturday, on the Battlefield. Lord Nycholas De Gyrlington (RDI Reiver) has agreed to call.
Since he has accepted my challenge, I state that the one who will stand as my second will be my dear son, Noble Morgan. However, he will not take my place, along with everyone else, should something happen in the course of the duel ((i.e. punt)). My Lady of Honor shall be the lady I always honor and cherish; My Lady Noelle.
My colors shall be blue, with metallic silver swords clashing at the back of my cloak; Lady Noelle's family colors.
My weapon shall be my father's rapier, Savior. May he duel well, and may man's honor win.
±
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 01:57:36 EST
::He chuckles to himself, thinking his challenge is the one that brought upon the least amount of public trouble, yet he writes::
>In closing, I state that it is a sad day when a man is seen as wrong for defending a friend<
Adonai...
I do not see it wrong for you defending a friend. That is not the reason of my challenge. I think it is wrong when you condemn those that you think do not side with Huma. You claimed that the loyal barons turned their back on Huma, when they merely state their points of view.
I have my facts clear, and I am showing no attempt to hide my feelings. Yet I did not post something publically, because I know that the topic would shake the boards with anger and disagreement.
I respect Huma, and to me he is a good friend. I heard what was said in the debate, and that's what I don't agree with. You seem to write that last statement, as a way to make me look like the bad guy. Shall I say my last statement, even though it will make the readers wonder?
"It is a sad day, when a man cannot accept a challenge with honor"
±
::Walks away, knowing that the readers wonder the meaning of this post, but that's only because he can't, and won't, post the reply he got from Adonai, when he did challenge::
Date: 20 Feb 1998 01:57:36 EST
::He chuckles to himself, thinking his challenge is the one that brought upon the least amount of public trouble, yet he writes::
>In closing, I state that it is a sad day when a man is seen as wrong for defending a friend<
Adonai...
I do not see it wrong for you defending a friend. That is not the reason of my challenge. I think it is wrong when you condemn those that you think do not side with Huma. You claimed that the loyal barons turned their back on Huma, when they merely state their points of view.
I have my facts clear, and I am showing no attempt to hide my feelings. Yet I did not post something publically, because I know that the topic would shake the boards with anger and disagreement.
I respect Huma, and to me he is a good friend. I heard what was said in the debate, and that's what I don't agree with. You seem to write that last statement, as a way to make me look like the bad guy. Shall I say my last statement, even though it will make the readers wonder?
"It is a sad day, when a man cannot accept a challenge with honor"
±
::Walks away, knowing that the readers wonder the meaning of this post, but that's only because he can't, and won't, post the reply he got from Adonai, when he did challenge::
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: jonalyn@aol.com (Jonalyn)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 02:50:48 EST
The commoner wanders to the posts, a smile quirks at the edges of her mouth as she recalls the attempt by the then Warlord, now Baron Adonai Uziel to keep his challenge to the former Baron, Moralitor The Black concealed from the public. She glances to the quill dangling on its ribbon, yet, for the moment, refrains from tacking a comment to the cork board. The commoner then flips though the other notes and missives.
Date: 20 Feb 1998 02:50:48 EST
The commoner wanders to the posts, a smile quirks at the edges of her mouth as she recalls the attempt by the then Warlord, now Baron Adonai Uziel to keep his challenge to the former Baron, Moralitor The Black concealed from the public. She glances to the quill dangling on its ribbon, yet, for the moment, refrains from tacking a comment to the cork board. The commoner then flips though the other notes and missives.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: dukeuziei@aol.com (Duke UzieI)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 13:52:39 EST
::frowns a bit a a few of the posts::
Honor? You wish to speak of honor? My pardon Var. But I believe I have been somewhat civil publically...but you still attempt to disrespect me as much as possible on these boards. I have kept my dislike for your challenge to myself as yet publically and have not brought out any of my reasons for that dislike.
So do not speak to me of honor Var, because your not showing any yourself. Your challenging a loyal Baron on the grounds of what you heard when I was upset and in a heated debate. You state that I have gone renegade. When I have done no such thing. You state that I insulted Iain....when he did the same to me. You cast me as wrong in places where it is easy to do so and I cannot defend against your accusations and I have made little attempt to
do so.
Your challenge and your repeated posts have been just short of insult, and your disrespect is obvious. And if you read my acceptance you would see that I did accept your challenge with honor. I am allowed to feel betrayed that you would challenge me on the basis of my defense of a friend. That in no way is showing you dishonor, nor have any of my concurrent posts.
So Var Medici-Giovanni, speak not of challenges with honor, for to paraphrase a brother Baron of mine * There are none anymore*. Of which you have quite rightly proven.
I am incensed that you have brought this challenge to this level of public dispute, and then you speak of me having no honor.
I am,
~Adonai Uziel~
~DragonLord of RhyDin~
~Baron of the Seventh~
Date: 20 Feb 1998 13:52:39 EST
::frowns a bit a a few of the posts::
Honor? You wish to speak of honor? My pardon Var. But I believe I have been somewhat civil publically...but you still attempt to disrespect me as much as possible on these boards. I have kept my dislike for your challenge to myself as yet publically and have not brought out any of my reasons for that dislike.
So do not speak to me of honor Var, because your not showing any yourself. Your challenging a loyal Baron on the grounds of what you heard when I was upset and in a heated debate. You state that I have gone renegade. When I have done no such thing. You state that I insulted Iain....when he did the same to me. You cast me as wrong in places where it is easy to do so and I cannot defend against your accusations and I have made little attempt to
do so.
Your challenge and your repeated posts have been just short of insult, and your disrespect is obvious. And if you read my acceptance you would see that I did accept your challenge with honor. I am allowed to feel betrayed that you would challenge me on the basis of my defense of a friend. That in no way is showing you dishonor, nor have any of my concurrent posts.
So Var Medici-Giovanni, speak not of challenges with honor, for to paraphrase a brother Baron of mine * There are none anymore*. Of which you have quite rightly proven.
I am incensed that you have brought this challenge to this level of public dispute, and then you speak of me having no honor.
I am,
~Adonai Uziel~
~DragonLord of RhyDin~
~Baron of the Seventh~
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: drakewynx@aol.com (Drakewyn x)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 13:42:57 EST
::Taking a moment from her entirely too busy day, she comes down to the Arena for her daily catching-up on news and events. Having already recieved a copy of Var's letter, she remembers that she has yet to reply to it... and so, she takes quill in hand and makes a public reply.::
Var,
I have faith in your skill, your resolve and your reasoning. I wish you the grandest of luck in your upcoming challenge, though I doubt I shall be able to attend. I know that you shall have all the Gryphons in your corner, and probably all of House Dragoon-Talanador as well.
In closing, let me state that there is no shame in challenging a Loyal Baron if you feel that said Baron does not hold to the ideals of loyalty to the Overlord as you do.
Duel well, and may the blessings of Peace be upon your heart.
Adonai,
'Tis an ill wind indeed, that blows no one good.
Grace, skill and honor to you both.
Lady Drake.
Date: 20 Feb 1998 13:42:57 EST
::Taking a moment from her entirely too busy day, she comes down to the Arena for her daily catching-up on news and events. Having already recieved a copy of Var's letter, she remembers that she has yet to reply to it... and so, she takes quill in hand and makes a public reply.::
Var,
I have faith in your skill, your resolve and your reasoning. I wish you the grandest of luck in your upcoming challenge, though I doubt I shall be able to attend. I know that you shall have all the Gryphons in your corner, and probably all of House Dragoon-Talanador as well.
In closing, let me state that there is no shame in challenging a Loyal Baron if you feel that said Baron does not hold to the ideals of loyalty to the Overlord as you do.
Duel well, and may the blessings of Peace be upon your heart.
Adonai,
'Tis an ill wind indeed, that blows no one good.
Grace, skill and honor to you both.
Lady Drake.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: iainmacknz@aol.com (IainMacKnz)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 14:47:25 EST
Lord Uziel:
Not having seen any public comment regarding your insults to me from your challenger, I find it curious that you bring my name up.
Further, I was under the impression that you had been satisfied that I had in no way offered you insult on the evening in question. Apparently, this is not the case. Should you, however, wish to recant that accusation, I might more easily forego the effort of detailing for the public the exact nature of your utterly unwarranted insult to my honor, and from whence it stemmed.
Do not give my present mild annoyance reason to swell into disrespect and contempt, Adonai. It is not my wish, and I am certain it is neither your own.
~irm
Date: 20 Feb 1998 14:47:25 EST
Lord Uziel:
Not having seen any public comment regarding your insults to me from your challenger, I find it curious that you bring my name up.
Further, I was under the impression that you had been satisfied that I had in no way offered you insult on the evening in question. Apparently, this is not the case. Should you, however, wish to recant that accusation, I might more easily forego the effort of detailing for the public the exact nature of your utterly unwarranted insult to my honor, and from whence it stemmed.
Do not give my present mild annoyance reason to swell into disrespect and contempt, Adonai. It is not my wish, and I am certain it is neither your own.
~irm
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: dukeuziei@aol.com (Duke UzieI)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 16:03:42 EST
Iain,
It was not. Mayhaps I mistated my meaning that you and I did exchange heated words during our debate. And that was what I was pointing out the the Warlord. I was in no way attempting to drag you into the dirt here per se. But merely illustrating that my argument was not merely one sided.
Apologies for any misperception,
~Adonai
Date: 20 Feb 1998 16:03:42 EST
Iain,
It was not. Mayhaps I mistated my meaning that you and I did exchange heated words during our debate. And that was what I was pointing out the the Warlord. I was in no way attempting to drag you into the dirt here per se. But merely illustrating that my argument was not merely one sided.
Apologies for any misperception,
~Adonai
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: sircetran@aol.com (Sir Cetran)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 16:22:59 EST
I believe the most true statment that begins with 'It is a sad day' would be...
"It truly is a sad day when Barons and the Overlord are not allowed to make mistakes before someone wagers challenge to them."
For every Warlord, ex-Warlord, and Warlords-to-be before making Challenge. Expectations are high and slightest mistake can end up costing you a beloved Ring. No one is perfect, yet many seem to believe that they should be in order to hold the Crown or a Ring.
Think about that stament before challenging, on impulse or not.
~^~Sir Damien Cetran~^~
Date: 20 Feb 1998 16:22:59 EST
I believe the most true statment that begins with 'It is a sad day' would be...
"It truly is a sad day when Barons and the Overlord are not allowed to make mistakes before someone wagers challenge to them."
For every Warlord, ex-Warlord, and Warlords-to-be before making Challenge. Expectations are high and slightest mistake can end up costing you a beloved Ring. No one is perfect, yet many seem to believe that they should be in order to hold the Crown or a Ring.
Think about that stament before challenging, on impulse or not.
~^~Sir Damien Cetran~^~
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: humadragbn@aol.com (HumaDragbn)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 16:20:23 EST
::glances at the postings and goes home to get his hip-waiders on::
Date: 20 Feb 1998 16:20:23 EST
::glances at the postings and goes home to get his hip-waiders on::
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 19:20:36 EST
::Reading the posts, writes::
Adonai, you say I have shown no honor? I feel that I have brought this publically because I feel it is a public matter. I may be showing you disrespect, when I mainly am trying to keep people informed on the truth. The fact that you are attempting to get the public on your side by hiding the facts is a disrespect to the public. You say you had no intentions to become renegade, when I CLEARLY remember you saying you were joining your friend
Huma, a renegade. I am sure others could back me up, if they wished to.
I remember this attack of Moralitor's honor, when he put forth your challenge publically. You seem to be making the same excuse for me, having a problem with honor. I am at least honest, towards the public, therefore showing the public respect. I was honorable and honest, with my original missive. I tended to lose respect for you as you showed me disrespect, in your reply.
And you are wrong. I am challenging a loyal baron on the grounds that he has insulted my friends, and showing a general lack of respect. I know what was said, Adonai. I was there. You say Iain insulted you, as well. I do believe someone else he knew was insulted by something you said, because the only reason he came in, I thought, was because someone he knew (and again, I won't mention who) was insulted by you. I don't expect Iain to back
this up, for he doesn't need to.
Perhaps, Adonai, you mispercieve your own actions.
And Damien.... Everyone is entitled to make mistakes. I find it sad though, that a loyal baron did show disrespect in this "debate", and the fact he hides facts from the public. That doesn't sound like loyalties, does it? These are my views, and I will live up to them.
±
Date: 20 Feb 1998 19:20:36 EST
::Reading the posts, writes::
Adonai, you say I have shown no honor? I feel that I have brought this publically because I feel it is a public matter. I may be showing you disrespect, when I mainly am trying to keep people informed on the truth. The fact that you are attempting to get the public on your side by hiding the facts is a disrespect to the public. You say you had no intentions to become renegade, when I CLEARLY remember you saying you were joining your friend
Huma, a renegade. I am sure others could back me up, if they wished to.
I remember this attack of Moralitor's honor, when he put forth your challenge publically. You seem to be making the same excuse for me, having a problem with honor. I am at least honest, towards the public, therefore showing the public respect. I was honorable and honest, with my original missive. I tended to lose respect for you as you showed me disrespect, in your reply.
And you are wrong. I am challenging a loyal baron on the grounds that he has insulted my friends, and showing a general lack of respect. I know what was said, Adonai. I was there. You say Iain insulted you, as well. I do believe someone else he knew was insulted by something you said, because the only reason he came in, I thought, was because someone he knew (and again, I won't mention who) was insulted by you. I don't expect Iain to back
this up, for he doesn't need to.
Perhaps, Adonai, you mispercieve your own actions.
And Damien.... Everyone is entitled to make mistakes. I find it sad though, that a loyal baron did show disrespect in this "debate", and the fact he hides facts from the public. That doesn't sound like loyalties, does it? These are my views, and I will live up to them.
±
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: iainmacknz@aol.com (IainMacKnz)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 19:56:08 EST
Lord Medici:
To clarify, I did not come into the arena that evening for that reason. I was, however, immediately met with Adonai's "lecture" toward my wife when I entered, at which point my discussion with him commenced.
Other than my dislike for attempts to press people into agreeing with one's position, I would have remained silent. Luthien is far from incapable from standing up for herself, either with tongue, pen, or blade.
~irm
Date: 20 Feb 1998 19:56:08 EST
Lord Medici:
To clarify, I did not come into the arena that evening for that reason. I was, however, immediately met with Adonai's "lecture" toward my wife when I entered, at which point my discussion with him commenced.
Other than my dislike for attempts to press people into agreeing with one's position, I would have remained silent. Luthien is far from incapable from standing up for herself, either with tongue, pen, or blade.
~irm
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 20 Feb 1998 20:09:10 EST
I must have misheard you, then. I apologize for that. And I apologize for those that read this, regarding my mistatement of the fact as to why Iain entered.
However, I still stand by all else. If anyone else, except the one who wishes to save face ::Regarding Adonai, for he doesn't trust his word or his judgement anymore:: please correct me if there are any misinterpretations.
±
Date: 20 Feb 1998 20:09:10 EST
I must have misheard you, then. I apologize for that. And I apologize for those that read this, regarding my mistatement of the fact as to why Iain entered.
However, I still stand by all else. If anyone else, except the one who wishes to save face ::Regarding Adonai, for he doesn't trust his word or his judgement anymore:: please correct me if there are any misinterpretations.
±
