Quick to Act
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
Quick to Act
From: zen80s@aol.com (Zen 80s)
Date: 27 May 1998 12:03:26 EDT
::goes to the board and posts a copy of the letter he has written::
Sir Daegarth Mithmellon,
Greetings and Salutations.
I will keep this letter short and make my purpose clear. You, perhaps more than anyone, remember well the circumstances surrounding my ring, for the short time I owned one, and how it was lost-- due to circumstances beyond my control, around the time of your challenge.
Know that I bear no ill will towards you. However, I do feel my ring was taken unjustly from me. Thus, I would like to reclaim one. Since you are the person who is chiefly responsible for costing me my ring in the first place, I feel that I owe it to you to remove yours from your possession.
Thus, on this twenty-seventh day of May, 1998, I announce that I am challenging you, Daegarth Mithmellon, for the right to hold the fourth Baron's Ring.
As proof that I have indeed earned this right, I give to you, and to others whom it may concern, a list of twelve peer wins (two extra, in case I have made errors in recording them) which show that I am worthy to make a challenge.
1. 5-9: Defeated X Gnort X 5-2 in 9 rounds - Caller: RDI Bird
2. 5-9: Defeated SteveG X 6.5-5 in 12 rounds - Caller: RDI Bird
3. 5-14: Defeated Nikthanas 5-3 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Rogue
4. 5-14: Defeated ReaperArkn 5-3 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Rose
5. 5-21: Defeated Sartan Z 5-1 in 11 rounds - Caller: RDI Rogue
6. 5-21: Defeated MoneyBlade 5-1 in 7 rounds - Caller: RDI Rogue
7. 5-21: Defeated TinyTopaz 5-4 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Morn
8. 5-23: Defeated LordovDale 5-2 in 7 rounds - Caller: RDI Bird
9. 5-24: Defeated Harris4801 5-1 in 9 rounds - Caller: RDI Luth
10. 5-24: Defeated Taylara 5-2.5 in 11 rounds - Caller: RDI Fiona
11. 5-24: Defeated LrdEvasion 5-3 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Fiona
12. 5-24: Defeated Rand alTan 5-4 in 12 rounds - Caller: RDI Daemon
I hope for a quick reply from you. I would like to have this resolved as soon as possible.
Regards,
Zen
Date: 27 May 1998 12:03:26 EDT
::goes to the board and posts a copy of the letter he has written::
Sir Daegarth Mithmellon,
Greetings and Salutations.
I will keep this letter short and make my purpose clear. You, perhaps more than anyone, remember well the circumstances surrounding my ring, for the short time I owned one, and how it was lost-- due to circumstances beyond my control, around the time of your challenge.
Know that I bear no ill will towards you. However, I do feel my ring was taken unjustly from me. Thus, I would like to reclaim one. Since you are the person who is chiefly responsible for costing me my ring in the first place, I feel that I owe it to you to remove yours from your possession.
Thus, on this twenty-seventh day of May, 1998, I announce that I am challenging you, Daegarth Mithmellon, for the right to hold the fourth Baron's Ring.
As proof that I have indeed earned this right, I give to you, and to others whom it may concern, a list of twelve peer wins (two extra, in case I have made errors in recording them) which show that I am worthy to make a challenge.
1. 5-9: Defeated X Gnort X 5-2 in 9 rounds - Caller: RDI Bird
2. 5-9: Defeated SteveG X 6.5-5 in 12 rounds - Caller: RDI Bird
3. 5-14: Defeated Nikthanas 5-3 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Rogue
4. 5-14: Defeated ReaperArkn 5-3 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Rose
5. 5-21: Defeated Sartan Z 5-1 in 11 rounds - Caller: RDI Rogue
6. 5-21: Defeated MoneyBlade 5-1 in 7 rounds - Caller: RDI Rogue
7. 5-21: Defeated TinyTopaz 5-4 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Morn
8. 5-23: Defeated LordovDale 5-2 in 7 rounds - Caller: RDI Bird
9. 5-24: Defeated Harris4801 5-1 in 9 rounds - Caller: RDI Luth
10. 5-24: Defeated Taylara 5-2.5 in 11 rounds - Caller: RDI Fiona
11. 5-24: Defeated LrdEvasion 5-3 in 8 rounds - Caller: RDI Fiona
12. 5-24: Defeated Rand alTan 5-4 in 12 rounds - Caller: RDI Daemon
I hope for a quick reply from you. I would like to have this resolved as soon as possible.
Regards,
Zen
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: iainmacknz@aol.com (IainMacKnz)
Date: 27 May 1998 12:50:09 EDT
Congratulations, Zen.
In your zeal to recover that which you feel was taken from you wrongly (when, in fact, you sorely deserved such a fate), you completely failed to remember you had to wait for the standings to be posted.
In other words, you're now going to have to wait quite awhile before you can try this again.
Ta.
Iain MacKenzie
Lord Tynsdale
Warlord and Thrice-Baron of the Duel of Swords
Date: 27 May 1998 12:50:09 EDT
Congratulations, Zen.
In your zeal to recover that which you feel was taken from you wrongly (when, in fact, you sorely deserved such a fate), you completely failed to remember you had to wait for the standings to be posted.
In other words, you're now going to have to wait quite awhile before you can try this again.
Ta.
Iain MacKenzie
Lord Tynsdale
Warlord and Thrice-Baron of the Duel of Swords
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: baphelocl@aol.com (Bapheloc L)
Date: 27 May 1998 13:00:41 EDT
(m) So much for a new era....
As far as I can tell the ink hasn't even been set to the DoS Standings for this week yet. So according to my understanding, Daegarth is not offically a holder of the 4th Baron's ring yet. So I believe your challenged is invalid, Zen.
To the Baron's Council,
I believe with the new rules, that now someone can be penalized and punished for such ignorance of the ways of the rings. I implore you to do just that to Zen to make an example of him. Nothing personal to Zen, I would ask this regardless of who was involved. It is time that respect for the titles of DoS was enforced, though it should be happily embraced.
Honor to thyself,
Baphelocutis est Lathadoscia
::sealed in wax by the signet ring stamp of the royal family Lathadoscia::
Date: 27 May 1998 13:00:41 EDT
(m) So much for a new era....
As far as I can tell the ink hasn't even been set to the DoS Standings for this week yet. So according to my understanding, Daegarth is not offically a holder of the 4th Baron's ring yet. So I believe your challenged is invalid, Zen.
To the Baron's Council,
I believe with the new rules, that now someone can be penalized and punished for such ignorance of the ways of the rings. I implore you to do just that to Zen to make an example of him. Nothing personal to Zen, I would ask this regardless of who was involved. It is time that respect for the titles of DoS was enforced, though it should be happily embraced.
Honor to thyself,
Baphelocutis est Lathadoscia
::sealed in wax by the signet ring stamp of the royal family Lathadoscia::
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 27 May 1998 18:16:20 EDT
Iain and Baphe,
My sincere thanks on the rules regarding challenges. I was a little confused. I was aware your peer wins had to be posted, but I didn't know that if someone attains rank after winning a challenge, it had to be written in the standings, as well.
±
"Nail a hole in your fence when you get angry. Remove the nail when you're not angry. You'll see that the actions you do, out of anger, will always leave a scar... Just look at the fence."
Date: 27 May 1998 18:16:20 EDT
Iain and Baphe,
My sincere thanks on the rules regarding challenges. I was a little confused. I was aware your peer wins had to be posted, but I didn't know that if someone attains rank after winning a challenge, it had to be written in the standings, as well.
±
"Nail a hole in your fence when you get angry. Remove the nail when you're not angry. You'll see that the actions you do, out of anger, will always leave a scar... Just look at the fence."
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: zen80s@aol.com (Zen 80s)
Date: 27 May 1998 18:19:22 EDT
::sighs::
Well, I guess I goofed.
::feels even worse about his situation now, and plans to make an inquiry about it::
Well, this is only appropriate that this should happen to me, I guess.
Date: 27 May 1998 18:19:22 EDT
::sighs::
Well, I guess I goofed.
::feels even worse about his situation now, and plans to make an inquiry about it::
Well, this is only appropriate that this should happen to me, I guess.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: karnafexx@aol.com (Karnafexx)
Date: 28 May 1998 14:45:44 EDT
<<My sincere thanks on the rules regarding challenges. I was a little confused. I was aware your peer wins had to be posted, but I didn't know that if someone attains rank after winning a challenge, it had to be written in the standings, as well.>>
Actually Var, that's not true. Once a person wins the ring they are a baron, period. Any one of the tourney winners could go out and duel a match as a baron even though it hasn't been posted in the standings. The second you win the ring you're a baron, there is no waiting time at all. I once challenged Kal for his barons ring when he was interceeding against my intercession (heheh) and if I had won that match I would have been a baron and had one
more fancy than the Overlord's challenger.
I guess ya' had ta' be there ta' understand that situation though.
::Written in choppy red crayola::
Billy Ray
AKA: Karnafexx
"Simply the Best"
Date: 28 May 1998 14:45:44 EDT
<<My sincere thanks on the rules regarding challenges. I was a little confused. I was aware your peer wins had to be posted, but I didn't know that if someone attains rank after winning a challenge, it had to be written in the standings, as well.>>
Actually Var, that's not true. Once a person wins the ring they are a baron, period. Any one of the tourney winners could go out and duel a match as a baron even though it hasn't been posted in the standings. The second you win the ring you're a baron, there is no waiting time at all. I once challenged Kal for his barons ring when he was interceeding against my intercession (heheh) and if I had won that match I would have been a baron and had one
more fancy than the Overlord's challenger.
I guess ya' had ta' be there ta' understand that situation though.
::Written in choppy red crayola::
Billy Ray
AKA: Karnafexx
"Simply the Best"
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: zen80s@aol.com (Zen 80s)
Date: 28 May 1998 14:49:08 EDT
You know, I wondered about that. I saw two overlords deposed in a week's time, before the standings were ever updated. I don't know if there was an exception to the rules that did not apply to my challenge, or what, but it happened, and it was a difference of which I was not aware.
Regardless, I have fixed the situation. Thanks, Iain, if you hadn't told me I probably would not have fixed it, and would have lost out.
~zen
Date: 28 May 1998 14:49:08 EDT
You know, I wondered about that. I saw two overlords deposed in a week's time, before the standings were ever updated. I don't know if there was an exception to the rules that did not apply to my challenge, or what, but it happened, and it was a difference of which I was not aware.
Regardless, I have fixed the situation. Thanks, Iain, if you hadn't told me I probably would not have fixed it, and would have lost out.
~zen
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 28 May 1998 15:04:45 EDT
::Grins, writing to BRK::
I guess I'm not old enough, eh Billy? What about when someone challenges for a rank, and wins the challenge? Do you have to wait until the standings are posted? I'm a little confused about that.
±
"Nail a hole in your fence when you get angry. Remove the nail when you're not angry. You'll see that the actions you do, out of anger, will always leave a scar... Just look at the fence."
Date: 28 May 1998 15:04:45 EDT
::Grins, writing to BRK::
I guess I'm not old enough, eh Billy? What about when someone challenges for a rank, and wins the challenge? Do you have to wait until the standings are posted? I'm a little confused about that.
±
"Nail a hole in your fence when you get angry. Remove the nail when you're not angry. You'll see that the actions you do, out of anger, will always leave a scar... Just look at the fence."
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: iainmacknz@aol.com (IainMacKnz)
Date: 28 May 1998 15:20:11 EDT
Billy:
Yes, your situation with Kalamere was a bit... different, but there is not, and never has been, anything in the rules preventing a dueler from issuing a challenge to someone who is interceding in a match.
Ah, the good old days, eh?
Zen:
The only cases I can recall in which an Overlord was deposed before the posting of the standings involved that Overlord gaining the title immediately prior to a Warlord Tourney, and opting to immediately face the mandatory challenge from the winner of that prize.
The rules specifically state, and always have, that no challenge may be issued to a Baron or the Overlord until the standings reflect their status, be it a new titleholder, or the completion of a previous challenge (Renegade Barons excepted).
Iain MacKenzie
Lord Tynsdale
Warlord and Thrice-Baron of the Duel of Swords.
Date: 28 May 1998 15:20:11 EDT
Billy:
Yes, your situation with Kalamere was a bit... different, but there is not, and never has been, anything in the rules preventing a dueler from issuing a challenge to someone who is interceding in a match.
Ah, the good old days, eh?
Zen:
The only cases I can recall in which an Overlord was deposed before the posting of the standings involved that Overlord gaining the title immediately prior to a Warlord Tourney, and opting to immediately face the mandatory challenge from the winner of that prize.
The rules specifically state, and always have, that no challenge may be issued to a Baron or the Overlord until the standings reflect their status, be it a new titleholder, or the completion of a previous challenge (Renegade Barons excepted).
Iain MacKenzie
Lord Tynsdale
Warlord and Thrice-Baron of the Duel of Swords.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: karnafexx@aol.com (Karnafexx)
Date: 28 May 1998 15:34:36 EDT
<< I guess I'm not old enough, eh Billy? What about when someone challenges for a rank, and wins the challenge? Do you have to wait until the standings are posted? I'm a little confused about that.>>
Var, Overlord and Baron are the only ranks that are effective immediately. Every other rank gained has to wait till the postings. Aside from that, if you win a barons ring you're a baron right away, if you become over-weenie you're the weenie right away too.
::Written in choppy red crayola::
Billy Ray
AKA: Karnafexx
"Simply the Best"
Date: 28 May 1998 15:34:36 EDT
<< I guess I'm not old enough, eh Billy? What about when someone challenges for a rank, and wins the challenge? Do you have to wait until the standings are posted? I'm a little confused about that.>>
Var, Overlord and Baron are the only ranks that are effective immediately. Every other rank gained has to wait till the postings. Aside from that, if you win a barons ring you're a baron right away, if you become over-weenie you're the weenie right away too.
::Written in choppy red crayola::
Billy Ray
AKA: Karnafexx
"Simply the Best"
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: kalamere@aol.com (Kalamere)
Date: 28 May 1998 15:50:46 EDT
> Var, Overlord and Baron are the only ranks that are effective immediately.
> Every other rank gained has to wait till the postings. Aside from that, if
> you win a barons ring you're a baron right away, if you become over-weenie
> you're the weenie right away too.
I'm afraid that is incorrect Billy... though I won't say that it will or has always been enforced in the same manner. A large number of challenges have been invalidated for being issued before the new Baron was listed as such in the standings.
There is no exception in the rules that makes the titled ranks any different in the case at hand. There are far fewer historical occurences of the title being effective immediately then there are of those where it has not (the only two I can think of are the one Iain just mentioned and when Athlstan was allowed to interceed for a loyal Baron although he had not yet been listed as Overlord in the standings). Judging by that, and the way it appears
Helix has chosen to read it, the rank of the new barons was not official until today's standings came out.
Date: 28 May 1998 15:50:46 EDT
> Var, Overlord and Baron are the only ranks that are effective immediately.
> Every other rank gained has to wait till the postings. Aside from that, if
> you win a barons ring you're a baron right away, if you become over-weenie
> you're the weenie right away too.
I'm afraid that is incorrect Billy... though I won't say that it will or has always been enforced in the same manner. A large number of challenges have been invalidated for being issued before the new Baron was listed as such in the standings.
There is no exception in the rules that makes the titled ranks any different in the case at hand. There are far fewer historical occurences of the title being effective immediately then there are of those where it has not (the only two I can think of are the one Iain just mentioned and when Athlstan was allowed to interceed for a loyal Baron although he had not yet been listed as Overlord in the standings). Judging by that, and the way it appears
Helix has chosen to read it, the rank of the new barons was not official until today's standings came out.
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: joaknshld@aol.com (J Oaknshld)
Date: 28 May 1998 18:25:56 EDT
DoS community,
As I have always understood it, rank and privilege passed with da ring. When a challenger was successful in dethronin' a baron and was given da ring he was immediately considered a baron, with both privileges and responsibilities of one. Now perhaps Helix has reinterpreted da tradition of passin' of rank, and da rules will be fixed accordingly. I have dueled da verra night after claminin' a baron's ring with 5 fancies in me arsenal, and
restricted ta one more dan me opponent. Both Helix, and da callers were aware of me situation, and agreed I was a baron. Perhaps times, and da rules have changed.
~J
Date: 28 May 1998 18:25:56 EDT
DoS community,
As I have always understood it, rank and privilege passed with da ring. When a challenger was successful in dethronin' a baron and was given da ring he was immediately considered a baron, with both privileges and responsibilities of one. Now perhaps Helix has reinterpreted da tradition of passin' of rank, and da rules will be fixed accordingly. I have dueled da verra night after claminin' a baron's ring with 5 fancies in me arsenal, and
restricted ta one more dan me opponent. Both Helix, and da callers were aware of me situation, and agreed I was a baron. Perhaps times, and da rules have changed.
~J
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: karnafexx@aol.com (Karnafexx)
Date: 28 May 1998 21:05:00 EDT
<<Helix has chosen to read it, the rank of the new barons was not official until today's standings came out.>>
This came about when I first became baron..at that time I was told by the FFGF Coord that when I had won the title I was entitled to the fancy use of that rank I had achieved.
Sorry if I'm speaking from older memory people.
::Written in choppy red crayola::
Billy Ray
AKA: Karnafexx
"Simply the Best"
Date: 28 May 1998 21:05:00 EDT
<<Helix has chosen to read it, the rank of the new barons was not official until today's standings came out.>>
This came about when I first became baron..at that time I was told by the FFGF Coord that when I had won the title I was entitled to the fancy use of that rank I had achieved.
Sorry if I'm speaking from older memory people.
::Written in choppy red crayola::
Billy Ray
AKA: Karnafexx
"Simply the Best"
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: prlunicorn@aol.com (PrlUnicorn)
Date: 28 May 1998 21:31:01 EDT
Using the fancies and challenging are two different animals..
CAK
Date: 28 May 1998 21:31:01 EDT
Using the fancies and challenging are two different animals..
CAK
-
DoS Archive
- Archivist
- Posts: 30701
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am
From: iainmacknz@aol.com (IainMacKnz)
Date: 28 May 1998 21:41:04 EDT
Jeff:
You are correct, except that the rules have always stated quite clearly the things I have already mentioned.
~irm
Date: 28 May 1998 21:41:04 EDT
Jeff:
You are correct, except that the rules have always stated quite clearly the things I have already mentioned.
~irm
