ooooooo yah

Read-only archive for the Duel of Swords
Locked
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

ooooooo yah

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:57 pm

From: damienmortis@aol.com (Damien Mortis)
Date: 28 Jul 2001 20:13:14 EDT

duhloin drag and spam, maggie, ooohnoogie, car an wildwhor, leosnarsoh dey
hangsulo, vacint, acorns have oink, gayman tailcut, sik on dat, gasios maxibut, versnotaflicks far, eyelicka myorgans, vacint or pervail march on da clay mon, clets

it beez dat tim a gin kidos
da 1 armd bandt gona strik agin
hoo b te lukee targit tes tim!
beng a memba o te he man womn h8trs club
its gata b a tchik
dats rit horsshank# big D is gunen fer Car an wildwhor
eet dat #4 ringa

D

ivana tinkl (4/6: XvEvan, 5-4 in 11 rounds ???)
d dud i bet fer da othr purdy ring (4/7: Daryl Kyle, 5-4 in 8 rounds Reiver)
eeeeeeeeeee (4/26: Elijah Basia Uhr, 5-3.5 in 9 rounds, Var)
splar (6/7: QuickVarMG, 5-3 in 9 rounds, Fish)
snegsalot (6/7: SgtSneggle, 5-2 in 9 rounds, Reiver)
BOB****(6/16: Knight7044, 5-2 in 7 rounds, Sevn)
acorn (6/16: XHavoickX, 5-3 in 7 rounds, Sevn)
se moos (6/16: Jakvaltrds, 5-4 in 8 rounds, Chris)
eejipt slav gi hoo ant hardcor (6/23: AnubisKaro, 5-4 in 11 rounds, Charlie)
hot lecksi (week of 7/11, on week 6 standings, Song of the Eve, 5.5-4.5 in 13 rounds)
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:57 pm

From: gnrtdrgoon@aol.com (GnrtDrgoon)
Date: 28 Jul 2001 20:30:40 EDT

Take'em down, Karen.
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:57 pm

From: karenwilder@aol.com (Karen Wilder)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 05:18:58 EDT

Ye know...

Before I saw yer note, Barkeep, I couldnae tell what this whole thing were about! Nor could any o' the others back at th' church. Phrobius, an elf who jest recently joined th' Order, suggested I take th' note tae a Troll tae be translated!

Kin anyone confirm thet this be an actual challenge letter?

Lady Karen Wilder
Knight Templar
Renegade Baroness of the Fourth.
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:58 pm

From: xhavoickx@aol.com (XHavoickX)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 08:03:08 EDT

Well, judging from the drunken babble and and otherwise unreadable script. I'd say, Damien just pressed challenge to ya. Any others confer?
Johnathan Ecorian "Cory" Havoick

(][Baron of the Seventh][)

[|]Mage[|]

[]Emerald[]
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:58 pm

From: dreystarke@aol.com (DreyStarke)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 13:11:03 EDT

Looked fairly straight forward to me.



- Starke
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:58 pm

From: charliejericho@aol.com (Charlie Jericho)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 13:24:13 EDT

"Kin anyone confirm thet this be an actual challenge letter?"

It took me a couple of times but I think I've got it now. The key is to read it out loud as if you were drunk. Here's the best I could come up with:


"Daelin Dragonsblade, Maggie (Damien's nickname for Magnus), Unagi, Karen Wilder, Leo De Lorenzo, vacant, Cory Havoick, Galin Taelca, Secondat, Gasios Maxibut (He meant Cassius Maximus but I think we should all start calling him "Gasios"), Verceterix Favre, Ellisa Morgan, vacant or Percival, Cletus,

It's that time again, kids.
The one armed bandit is going to strike again.
Who will be the lucky target this time?
Being a member of the He-man Woman Haters' Club,
it's got to be a chick.
That's right, 'horssank' (Still not sure what 'horssank' means. Any guesses?)
The big D (Damien's nickname for himself) is gunning for Karen Wilder.
It's that Number 4 Ring."

What followed that was a list of his peer wins, I believe. However, exactly who they were is anybody's guess. I got stuck on "Splar".


Charlie
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:59 pm

From: adonaiuziel@aol.com (Adonai Uziel)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 13:50:23 EDT

I'd say, overall, the scary part is the more you read it, the more it makes sense.

Mayhaps its due to erosive brain damage from being exposed to it?

~Adonai
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:59 pm

From: xhavoickx@aol.com (XHavoickX)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 14:46:30 EDT

>I got stuck on "Splar".
>
>
>Charlie

I believe "Splar" is Var. Hmm...Splar..::chuckles:: Got a new nickname for the Cap.

Johnathan Ecorian "Cory" Havoick

(][Baron of the Seventh][)

[|]Mage[|]

[]Emerald[]
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 6:59 pm

rom: karenwilder@aol.com (Karen Wilder)
Date: 30 Jul 2001 01:34:52 EDT

Yep...

Looks like Miss Charlie be right. I jest got confirmation from a drunk Troll a little bit ago. He were th' first being thet I found thet could read thet mess.

Guess I's'll jest wait fer the challenge tae be confirmed by th' Standin's Keeper now.

Lady Karen Wilder
Knight Templar
Renegade Baroness of the Fourth.
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:00 pm

From: damienmortis@aol.com (Damien Mortis)
Date: 07 Aug 2001 13:38:29 EDT

Barons, Overlord, Commission,

I write to you on behalf of my client, Damien Mortis, concerning his challenge for the 4th Baronial Ring of the Duel of Swords.  On Monday, July 30th at 10:29 PM, Damien and the Baroness Wilder recieved confirmation that Damien's bona fides had been confirmed.  From that time, there was no contact made by the Baroness for a period longer than one week.  The first reply from Baroness Wilder came last evening at 10:31, two minutes after her one week
deadline had passed. 

Though two minutes may not seem like a long time, the Baroness is in violation of the Terms of Challenge which state that Barons have one week to resond to a challenge from the point of verification.  Baroness Wilder has gone over that one week time frame and thus is in violation of the rules of engagement. 

Furthermore, her only offered time is one less than three days hence, allowing my client little time to prepare for his match.

I ask the Baroness to be held in forfiet for her failure to comply with the Universal Terms of Challenge.  The rule was very clearly broken, no matter by how small of a margin.  If asked, I will supply the documents that prove she was over her time limit. 

Violations of governing rules should not be tolerated.  My client and I await a response from the commission, which we hope will begin the process of reprimanding her for this infraction.

Jeff Krasnow
Jeff Krasnow and Associates
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:00 pm

From: quickvarmg@aol.com (QuickVarMG)
Date: 07 Aug 2001 14:54:18 EDT

I am hoping that the match is not held in forfeit. I believe that when someone has seven days to answer, they have until the end of the seventh day. If we're going to get technical about the actual time someone has to respond, the rules should state that the baron(ess) has 168 hours or

::Sloppy handwriting follows this portion where he multiplies 168 with 60::

10080 minutes to respond.

As long as Karen responded on August 6th, I don't believe this is a case that should be called to forfeit. If I were on the council or the commission, that's exactly how I'd vote.


Var Medici-Giovanni


Proud Father, Proud Husband
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:00 pm

From: leducblanc@aol.com (LeDucBlanc)
Date: 07 Aug 2001 15:00:33 EDT

I would have to say that I agree entirely with Var here. I would also have to say, very strongly, that I would guess that Damien is seeking the forfeit because he knows he has no chance against Karen and is horribly scared she will hurt him.
Or else he is drunk enough to think he can get away with it.







Duc Percival Marchand de Clermont

Warlord of the Duel of Swords

The White Duke
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:01 pm

From: hostpcgstormi@aol.com (HOST PCG Stormi)
Date: 09 Aug 2001 20:12:24 EDT

>If I were on the council or the commission, that's exactly how I'd vote.
>

::A copy of the following missive was delivered to the Warlord, Baroness, Commission and Barons Council.::

All concerned,
The challenge was answered in a last minute, yet timely manner and there is no reason why this challenge should not go forward. If Warlord Mortis wishes to take this to the Commission so that they may turn it over to the Barons Council he is more then welcome, but as *Standings Keeper* this challenge was issued, validated and responded to and Warlord Mortis and Baroness Wilder are asked to make final arrangements.
The Commission/Barons Council may overturn my decision if they see fit to do so.

Sincerely,
HOST PCG Stormi
DFC/Caller of Swords and Standings Keeper
(AOL Community Leader Volunteer)
DoS Archive
Archivist
Posts: 30701
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 am

Post by DoS Archive » Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:02 pm

From: jadeddeath@aol.com (JadedDeath)
Date: 11 Aug 2001 01:59:57 EDT

He's a drunk, and he's a coward for requesting a forfeit over a matter of moments.

A horse's freshly ejected dung takes longer than that to hit the ground.

It's obvious who stands as the better in this challenge, and the duel hasn't even been bloody scheduled yet.

-Janella
Locked